Photo by Josh Blanchfield

In the days leading up to last night’s Hartford Board of Education meeting, Chair Matt Poland lamented on social media that there was “too much noise” in the debates over public education, especially in Hartford where “pundits, unions, and those comfortable with a broken system” choked out parents and students. It was clear last night that parents and students were more than willing to oblige Poland with the “noise.”

An over-capacity crowd packed in to the Sarah J. Rawson auditorium for the public comment portion of the Board meeting. The main event was Superintendent Christina Kishimoto’s proposal to hand SAND Elementary School over to the newly formed private management company Capital Preparatory Schools Inc. SAND would become the first property of administrator Steve Perry’s plan to replicate the model used in his Capital Preparatory magnet school.

Just days after the John C. Clark School had been targeted for an Achievement First charter school take over, SAND was now targeted for private takeover. The evening began with a surreal speech by Poland. The speech, wavering between combative and sentimental, was wholly narcissistic. The narrative? Everyone is out to get me and I’m the real champion of public education…and you are all lying liars. As Poland eagerly put on his mantle of the victim, scores of neighborhood activists passed out stickers against the SAND proposal and attacks on public schools.

Clark School parents and leaders praised by Superintendent Kishimoto // Photo by Josh Blanchfield

The political theater continued as Kishimoto and Poland called upon the Clark School leaders, specifically Millie Soto, to stand and be recognized for outstanding leadership. The crowd cheered at this, although Kishimoto and Poland then laid out a new narrative where they had been on the Clark School’s and Soto’s side all along, but “outsiders” had gotten in the way.

Once Kishimoto and Poland had finished attempting to rewrite recent history, the push back against the Board and its leadership began, and didn’t stop, with legendary neighborhood activist Hyacinth Yennie. She railed against school reform and “choice” as it created conditions that pitted parents against parents. Yennie reminded the crowd that Dwight School was a Blue Ribbon school, but was shuttered by the Board regardless; the label of “failing” is a ruse. Her thundering demand to “put a leash on Perry” set the crowd ablaze and it didn’t stop there. Speaker after speaker put not just the SAND proposal on trial, but the entire “reform” agenda of the Hartford Board.

The Capital Preparatory contingent featured the uniformed students giving prepared remarks that all eerily presented the same message: replicate our school. The privatization plan for SAND was not the only topic featuring angry parents. Parents from elite, “successful” schools such as Annie Fisher Montessori and Renzulli Academy all brought the same complaint as the SAND community: the Board talks a good game when it comes to transparency, but it is all talk. Again and again the Board and its leadership was called out for its secret dealings, backroom politicking, and its lack of communication.

Photo by Josh Blanchfield

This culminated following Hartford Federation of Teachers President Andrea Johnson’s scathing remarks. Johnson condemned the leadership for violating state law, numerous times, with its attempts to circumvent and exclude the city’s School Governance Councils. She also called Poland and Kishimoto out for attempting to vote on the privatization plan for SAND in executive session, far from the public and behind closed doors. Poland lashed out at these charges and called critics “liars” for spreading misinformation, although all of it was clearly stated in the prepared agenda.

Following the public comment period, the crowds streamed out as it was clear the meeting was in fact going into executive session. Eventually, the Board returned and in a 5-3 vote rejected every component of the Sheff v. O’Neil settlement plan, including the handover of SAND to Perry’s private management firm.

It is clear that Hartford parents, from those in “successful” schools to those in labeled “failing” schools” are not content with Hartford reform efforts. Although the outcome of the evening’s vote may seem like a victory, it is vital to recognize that the systemic conditions that led to the attacks on Clark and SAND still exist: a majority appointed board, marginalized and ignored School Governance Councils, and diffused parent outrage. Until these conditions are ameliorated, it will take constant and vigilant direct action to keep the Board and its intermediaries in check. Hopefully, this includes as much noise as necessary.